mg·g–1 | |||
品种 Cultrivar | 对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 复水处理 Re-watering |
L-1 | 8.38 ± 0.57a | 7.35 ± 0.57a | 8.15 ± 1.27a |
L-2 | 8.06 ± 1.07a | 5.71 ± 0.38b | 7.39 ± 0.85a |
L-3 | 7.35 ± 0.43a | 6.34 ± 0.71ab | 6.60 ± 0.70a |
L-4 | 8.23 ± 0.43a | 5.76 ± 0.86b | 6.37 ± 0.53a |
L-1,陇藜1号;L-2,陇藜2号;L-3,陇藜3号;L-4,陇藜4号;同列不同小写字母表示同一处理不同品种间差异显著(P < 0.05)。下同。 L-1, Longli No.1; L-2, Longli No.2; L-3, Longli No.3; L-4, Longli No.4. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level. similarly for the following tables and figures. |

Citation: LIU W Y, HE B, YANG F R, LYU W, WANG W T, HUANG J, WEI Y M, JIN Q, CHEN Y X. Physiological response to drought and re-watering of different quinoa varieties. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(10): 2655-2665. doi:

不同品种藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应
English
Physiological response to drought and re-watering of different quinoa varieties
-
Key words:
- Chenopodium quinoa /
- drought stress /
- rehydration /
- chlorophyll fluorescence /
- antioxidant enzymes
-
-
-
[1]
CHENG L X, WANG Y P, HE Q, LI X J, ZHANG F. Comparative proteomics illustrates the complexity of drought resistance mechanisms in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under dehydration and rehydration[J]. BMC Plant BiologyBMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16(): 188-210. doi:
-
[2]
曹丹, 陈道钳, 吴茜, 殷俐娜, 邓西平, 王仕稳. 复水对旱后不同玉米品种植株生长恢复能力及其生理响应特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报西北植物学报, 2015, 35(6): 1222-1228. doi:
CAO D, CHEN D Q, WU Q, YIN L N, DENG X P, WANG S W. Research on re-watering post-drought growth recovery capacity and physiological characteristics of different maize varieties[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia SinicaActa Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(6): 1222-1228. doi: -
[3]
LIU C G, WANG Y J, PAN K W, JIN Y Q, LIANG J, ZHANG L. Photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen metabolism and the relationship between their metabolites and lipid peroxidation in dwarf bamboo (Fargesia rufa Yi) during drought and subsequent recovery[J]. TreesTrees, 2015, 29(6): 1633-1647. doi:
-
[4]
魏清江, 冯芳芳, 马张正, 苏受婷, 宁少君, 辜青青. 干旱复水对柑橘幼苗叶片光合、叶绿素荧光及根系构型的影响[J]. 应用生态学报应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2485-2492.
WEI Q J, FENG F F, M Z Z, SU S T, NING S J, GU Q Q. Effects of drought and rewatering on leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and root architecture of citrus seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied EcologyChinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2485-2492. -
[5]
刘婷婷, 陈道钳, 王仕稳, 殷俐娜, 邓西平. 不同品种高粱幼苗在干旱复水过程中的生理生态响应[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2018, 27(6): 100-110.
LIU T T, CHEN D Q, WANG S W, YIN L N, DENG X P. Physio-ecological responses to drought and subsequent re-watering in sorghum seedlings[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 100-110. -
[6]
李州, 彭燕, 苏星源. 不同叶型白三叶抗氧化保护及渗透调节生理对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 257-263. doi:
LI Z, PENG Y, SU X Y. Physiological responses of white clover by different leaf types associated with anti-oxidative enzyme protection and osmotic adjustment under drought stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 257-263. doi: -
[7]
杨发荣. 藜麦新品种陇藜1号的选育及应用前景[J]. 甘肃农业科技甘肃农业科技, 2015, 12(): 1-5. doi:
YANG F R. Breeding and application prospects of new variety Chenopodium quinoa cv. Longli 1[J]. Gansu Agricultural Sciences and TechnologyGansu Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2015, 12(): 1-5. doi: -
[8]
顾娴, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 金茜, 杨发荣. 藜麦研究进展及发展前景[J]. 中国农学通报中国农学通报, 2015, 31(30): 201-204. doi:
GU X, HUANG J, WEI Y M, JIN Q, YANG F R. Development prospects and research of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science BulletinChinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(30): 201-204. doi: -
[9]
刘文瑜, 杨发荣, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 金茜. NaCl胁迫对藜麦幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报西北植物学报, 2017, 37(9): 1797-1804. doi:
LIU W Y, YANG F R, HUANG J, WEI Y M, JIN Q. Response of seedling growth and the activities of antioxidant enzymes of Chenopodium quinoa to salt stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia SinicaActa Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(9): 1797-1804. doi: -
[10]
杨发荣, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 李敏权, 何学功, 郑健. 藜麦生物学特性及应用[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2017, 34(3): 607-613. doi:
YANG F R, HUANG J, WEI Y M, LI M Q, HE X G, ZHENG J. A review of biological characteristics, applications and culture of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2017, 34(3): 607-613. doi: -
[11]
黄杰, 杨发荣, 李敏权, 魏玉明, 顾娴, 漆永红. 13个藜麦材料在甘肃临夏旱作区适应性的初步研究[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 191-201. doi:
HUANG J, YANG F R, LI M Q, WEI Y M, GU X, QI Y H. Preliminary evaluation of adaptability of 13 quinoa varieties in the Linxia arid region of Gansu Province, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 191-201. doi: -
[12]
郑度. 中国西北干旱区环境问题与生态建设[J]. 河北师范大学学报(自然科学版)河北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 30(3): 349-352. doi:
ZHENG D. Environmental issues and eco-reconstruction in Northwest arid region of China[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Natural Science Edition)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 30(3): 349-352. doi: -
[13]
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 169-184.
LI H S. Principal and Technology of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiment. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 169-184. -
[14]
李小芳, 张志良. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016: 208.
LI X F, ZHANG Z L. Guide of Plant Physiological Experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2016: 208. -
[15]
HUANG X S, LIU J H, CHEN X J. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes[J]. BMC Plant BiologyBMC Plant Biology, 2010, 10(): 230-. doi:
-
[16]
SHI S, FU X Z, PENG T, HUANG X S, FAN Q J, LIU J H. Spermine pretreatment confers dehydration tolerance of citrus in vitro plants via modulation of antioxidative capacity and stomatal response[J]. Tree PhysiologyTree Physiology, 2010, 30(): 914-922. doi:
-
[17]
YANG P M, HUANG Q C, QIN G Y, ZHAO S P, ZHOU J G. Different drought-stress responses in photosynthesis and reactive oxygen metabolism between autotetraploid and diploid rice[J]. PhotosyntheticaPhotosynthetica, 2014, 52(2): 193-202. doi:
-
[18]
JEBARA S, JEBARA M, LIMAM F, AOUANI M E. Changes in ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, guaiacol peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) nodules under salt stress[J]. Journal of Plant PhysiologyJournal of Plant Physiology, 2005, 162(): 929-936. doi:
-
[19]
LI Z, TAN X F, LU K, LIU Z M, WU L L. The effect of CaCl 2 on calcium content, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence of tung tree seedlings under drought stress[J]. PhtotosyntheticaPhtotosynthetica, 2017, 55(3): 553-560. doi:
-
[20]
CHEN D Q, WANG S W, CAO B B, CAO D, LENG G H, LI H B, YIN L N, SHAN L, DENG X P. Genotypic variation in growth and physiological response to drought stress and re-watering reveals the critical role of recovery in drought adaptation in maize seedlings[J]. Frontiers in Plant ScienceFrontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6(): 1-15.
-
[21]
BG视讯 strasser r j, srivastava a, tsimilli-michael m. the fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. //probing photosynthesis: mechanism, regulation and adaptation. london: taylor & francis, 1998: 1-59.
-
[22]
ZAKS J, AMARNATH K, SYLAK-GLASSMAN E J, FLEMING G R. Models and measurements of energy-dependent quenching[J]. Photosynthesis ResearchPhotosynthesis Research, 2013, 116(): 389-409. doi:
-
[23]
SAYED O H. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in cereal crop research[J]. PhotosyntheticaPhotosynthetica, 2003, 41(): 321-330. doi:
-
[24]
ALEXANDER S L, EVGENY V T, ElLVERA S S, ANDREY A L, JAIME A T. Mild abiotic stresses have different effects on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of young woody and herbaceous invasive plants[J]. Acta Physiologiae PlantarumActa Physiologiae Plantarum, 2017, 39(1): 20-26. doi:
-
[25]
张丹, 任洁, 王慧梅. 干旱胁迫及复水对红松针叶和树皮绿色组织光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 生态学杂志生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 2606-2614.
ZHANG D, REN J, WANG H M. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant system in needles and bark chlorenchyma of Korean pine to drought stress and rehydration[J]. Chinese Journal of EcologyChinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(10): 2606-2614. -
[26]
李晓梅, 盛积贵. 干旱和复水对2种辣椒叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西南农业学报西南农业学报, 2016, 29(1): 2567-2572.
LI X M, SHENG J G. Effect of drought stress and rehydration on chlorophyll fluorescence of two species of Capsicum[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural SciencesSouthwest China Journal of Agricultural SciencesBG视讯, 2016, 29(1): 2567-2572. -
[27]
张金政, 张起源, 孙国锋, 何卿, 李晓东, 刘洪章. 干旱胁迫及复水对玉簪生长和光合作用的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 167-176. doi:
ZHANG J Z, ZHANG Q Y, SUN G F, HE Q, LI X D, LIU H Z. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and photosynthesis of Hosta[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 167-176. doi: -
[28]
张利霞, 常青山, 侯小改, 陈苏丹, 戴攀峰. NaCl胁迫对夏枯草幼苗抗氧化能力及光合特性的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2017, 26(11): 167-175. doi:
ZHANG L X, CHANG Q S, HOU X G, CHEN S D, DAI P F. Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant capacity and photosynthetic characteristics of Prunella vulgaris seedlings[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11): 167-175. doi: -
[29]
张木清, 陈如凯. 作物抗旱分子生理与遗传改良. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
BG视讯 ZHANG M Q, CHEN R K. Molecular Physiology of Crop Drought Resistance and Genetic Improvement. Beijing: Sciences Press, 2005. -
[30]
AZZEME A M, ABDULLAH S N A, AZIZ M A, WAHAB P E M. Oil palm leaves and roots differ in physiological response, antioxidant enzyme activities and expression of stress-responsive genes upon exposure to drought stress[J]. Acta Physiologiae PlantarumActa Physiologiae Plantarum, 2016, 38(): 52-63. doi:
-
[31]
王蕊, 李新国, 李绍鹏, 黄绵佳, 曾丽萍. 短期干旱胁迫和复水对巴西蕉幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报热带作物学报, 2010, 31(8): 1362-1367. doi:
WANG R, LI X G, LI S P, HUANG M J, ZENG L P. Effects of short-term drought stress and re-watering in physiological characteristics of Brazil banana plantlet[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical CropsChinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2010, 31(8): 1362-1367. doi: -
[32]
刘文瑜, 杨宏伟, 魏小红, 刘博, 王高强, 吴伟涛. 外源NO调控盐胁迫下蒺藜苜蓿种子萌发生理特性及抗氧化酶的研究[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2015, 24(2): 85-95. doi:
LIU W Y, YANG H W, WEI X H, LIU B, WANG G Q, WU W T. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on seed germination, physiological characteristics and active oxygen metabolism of Medicago truncatula under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(2): 85-95. doi: -
[33]
董靖, 李红丽, 董智, 白文华. H2S对NaCl胁迫下草木樨幼苗生理指标及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2018, 35(10): 2430-2437. doi:
DONG J, LI H L, DONG Z, BAI W H. Effect of H2S on physiological indexes and antioxidant activity of sweet clover seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10): 2430-2437. doi: -
[34]
田又升, 谢宗铭, 张建新, 董永梅, 李有忠, 于航, 王志军, 张成双. 干旱复水对棉花苗期抗氧化系统及光合荧光参数的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(6): 209-214. doi:
TIAN Y S, XIE Z M, ZHANG J X, DONG Y M, LI Y Z, YU H, WANG Z J, ZHANG C S. Effects of drought and re-watering on antioxidant system and photosynthetic fluorescence parameters of cotton seedlings[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid AreasAgricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(6): 209-214. doi: -
[35]
崔豫川, 张文辉, 李志萍. 干旱和复水对栓皮栎幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学林业科学, 2014, 50(7): 66-73.
CUI Y C, ZHANG W H, LI Z P. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and physiological characteristics of Quercus variabilis seedlings[J]. Scientia Silvae SinicaScientia Silvae Sinica, 2014, 50(7): 66-73. -
[36]
吴凯朝, 黄诚梅, 邓智年, 曹辉庆, 魏源文, 徐林, 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛. 干旱后复水对甘蔗伸长期生理生化特性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报南方农业学报, 2015, 46(7): 1166-1172. doi:
WU K C, HUANG C M, DENG Z N, CAO H Q, WEI Y W, XU L, LI Y R, YANG L T. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on physiological biochemical characteristics in sugarcane at elongation stage[J]. Journal of Southern AgricultureJournal of Southern Agriculture, 2015, 46(7): 1166-1172. doi: -
[37]
高悦, 朱永铸, 杨志民, 杜红梅. 干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报草地学报, 2012, 20(2): 336-341. doi:
GAO Y, ZHU Y Z, YANG Z M, DU H M. Effects of drought stress and recovery on antioxidant enzyme activities of Agropyron cristatum[J]. Acta Agrestia SinicaActa Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(2): 336-341. doi: -
[38]
崔婷茹, 于慧敏, 李会彬, 边秀举, 王丽宏. 干旱胁迫及复水对狼尾草幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2017, 34(4): 788-793. doi:
CUI T R, YU H M, LI H B, BIAN X J, WANG L H. Effect of drought stress and re-watering on physiological characteristics of Pennisetum alopecuroides seedlings[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2017, 34(4): 788-793. doi: -
[39]
蔡丽艳, 孙启忠, 李志勇, 李鸿雁, 师文贵, 刘磊. 干旱胁迫和复水对扁蓿豆幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报华北农学报, 2012, 27(6): 107-112. doi:
CAI L Y, SUN Q Z, LI Z Y, LI H Y, SHI W G, LIU L. Effects of drought stress and rehydration on physiological characteristics of Medicago ruthenica seedlings[J]. Agriculturae Boreal-sinicaAgriculturae Boreal-sinica, 2012, 27(6): 107-112. doi:
-
[1]
-
BG视讯
图 1 干旱胁迫和复水对藜麦幼苗叶片初始荧光和最大荧光的影响
Figure 1. Effect of drought stress and rehydration on Fo and Fm of quinoa seedling leaves
图 2 BG视讯 干旱胁迫和复水对藜麦幼苗叶片PSⅡ最大光化学效率和潜在活性的影响
Figure 2. Effect of drought stress and rehydration on Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo of quinoa seedling leaves
图 3 BG视讯 干旱胁迫和复水对藜麦幼苗叶片非光化学猝灭系数的影响
Figure 3. BG视讯 Effect of drought stress and rehydration on NPQ of quinoa seedling leaves
图 4 干旱胁迫和复水对藜麦幼苗叶片MDA含量和O2·-产生速率的影响
Figure 4. Effect of drought stress and rehydration on MDA contents and O2·-BG视讯 production rate of quinoa
图 5 干旱胁迫和复水对藜麦幼苗叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响
Figure 5. Effect of drought stress and rehydration on activities of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX of quinoa seedling leaves
表 1 干旱胁迫及复水对藜麦幼苗叶片叶绿素含量的影响
Table 1. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on chlorophyll contents of quinoa seedlings
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同品种藜麦各指标间相关系数矩阵
Table 2. Correlation coefficient matrix among various indices of different quinoa varieties
指标
IndicesI2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I1 –0.033 0.288 0.796** 0.797** –0.710** –0.762** –0.289 –0.100 –0.386 –0.047 –0.667* I2 0.890** 0.248 0.229 –0.230 –0.013 –0.335 –0.526 –0.136 –0.013 –0.208 I3 0.559 0.541 –0.420 –0.271 –0.368 –0.567 –0.045 0.101 –0.473 I4 0.996* –0.837** –0.534 –0.403 –0.471 –0.322 –0.037 –0.841** I5 –0.834** –0.511 –0.437 –0.476 –0.349 –0.091 –0.860** I6 0.481 0.406 0.554 0.550 0.252 0.803** I7 –0.100 0.071 0.196 –0.380 0.386 I8 0.120 0.646 0.578 0.661* I9 0.254 0.316 0.487 I10 0.679* 0.538 I11 0.389 I1:叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content;I2:Fo;I3:Fm;I4:Fv/Fo;I5:Fv/Fm;I6:NPQ;I7:MDA含量 MDA content;I8:O2·-产生速率 O2·- production rate;I9:SOD活性 SOD activity;I10:POD活性POD activity;I11:CAT活性 CAT activity;I12:APX活性 APX activity;*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平上显著和极显著相关;表3同。
* indicates significant concentration at 0.05 and 0.01 level. similarly for the following Table 3.下载: 导出CSV
表 3 BG视讯 各品种隶属函数值和综合评价值
Table 3. BG视讯 Subordinative function and comprehensive evaluation of different varieties
品种
Cultivar隶属函数值 Subordinative function 综合评价值
Comprehensive evaluationI1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 L-1 0.553 0.491 0.458 0.427 0.429 0.581 0.535 0.523 0.605 0.568 0.491 0.442 0.509 L-2 0.575 0.525 0.468 0.433 0.437 0.531 0.468 0.430 0.488 0.577 0.452 0.543 0.494 L-3 0.387 0.527 0.496 0.459 0.465 0.513 0.425 0.422 0.386 0.486 0.453 0.513 0.461 L-4 0.491 0.510 0.518 0.384 0.387 0.491 0.508 0.506 0.489 0.477 0.524 0.481 0.481 下载: 导出CSV
-