处理 Treatment | 方法 Method |
对照 Control | 全光照 Full lighting |
50%遮阴 Shade 50% | 2层黑网遮阴 Two layers of black net shade |
70%遮阴 Shade 70% | 3层黑网遮阴 Three layers of black net shade |

Citation: ZHANG R, HAN B, YANG W, TANG M, REN J, XU W H, MA X L. Effect of shading on light response curve of mixed lawn grass during the initial stage of establishment. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(10): 2507-2515. doi:

遮阴对建植初期混播草坪草光响应曲线的影响
English
Effect of shading on light response curve of mixed lawn grass during the initial stage of establishment
-
-
-
[1]
韩烈保. 草坪管理学. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1994: 103-106.
HAN L B. Lawn Management. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1994: 103-106. -
[2]
邱亦维. 林下微生境对草坪草生理生态影响的研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文, 2002.
QIU Y W. Research on the effects of woods micro- environment on the physiology of turf. Master Thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2002. -
[3]
马向丽, 许文花, 兰国湘, 杨蔚, 毕玉芬, 任健, 匡彦蓓, 江元昌. 3种混播草坪外观质量比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报中国农学通报, 2015, 31(34): 129-132. doi:
MA X L, XU W H, LAN G X, YANG W, BI Y F, REN J, KUANG Y P, JIANG Y C. Comparison of appearance quality of three kinds of mixed turf[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science BulletinChinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(34): 129-132. doi: -
[4]
EMMONS, ROBERT D. 冯钟粒(译).草坪科学与管理.北京: 中国林业出版社.1992:124-134.
EMMONS, ROBERT D. FENG Z L (trans.). Lawn Science and Management. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press, 1992: 124-134. -
[5]
李晓鹏. 遮阴对不同品种高羊茅成坪质量的影响[J]. 农业科技与信息农业科技与信息, 2010, (14): 49-50. doi:
LI X P. Effects of shading on quality of different Festuca arundinacea turf[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology and InformationAgricultural Science and Technology and Information, 2010, (14): 49-50. doi: -
[6]
HASHEMI D F, HERBERT S J. Intensi fying plandensity response of corn with arti ficial shade[J]. Agronomy JournalAgronomy Journal, 1992, 84(): 547-551. doi:
-
[7]
付娟娟, 张瀚文, 陈浩, 呼天明, 许岳飞. 不同遮荫方式对高羊茅形态和生理变化的影响[J]. 北方园艺北方园艺, 2012, (7): 46-48.
FU J J, ZHANG H W, CHEN H, HU T M, XU Y F. Study on morphology and physiology in leaves of Festuca arundinace under shade treaments[J]. Northern HorticultureNorthern HorticultureBG视讯, 2012, (7): 46-48. -
[8]
LUSK C H, CONTRERAS O. Foliage area and crown nitrogen turnover in temperate rain forest juvenile trees of differing shade tolerance[J]. Journal of EcologyJournal of Ecology, 1999, 87(): 973-983. doi:
-
[9]
贺彩艳, 李德荣. 求米草的耐阴性研究[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2013, 30(10): 1531-1534.
HE C Y, LI D R. Studies on shade-endurance capacity of Oplismenus[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2013, 30(10): 1531-1534. -
[10]
王迅, 张新全, 刘金平. 草坪草对遮荫胁迫的生理反应[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2006, 23(4): 86-90. doi:
WANG X, ZHANG X Q, LIU J P. The main physiological reaction of turf grass to shading stress[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2006, 23(4): 86-90. doi: -
[11]
曾晓琳. 坡向对冷季型护坡草坪生长发育及群落稳定性的影响. 南充: 西华师范大学硕士论文, 2016.
ZENG X L. Effects of slope aspect on growth and community stability of cold-season slope protective turf. Master Thesis. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2016. -
[12]
王亚亚. 陇东苹果园土壤和光照对林下牧草种子萌发、苗期生长和光合特性的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学硕士学位论文, 2018.
BG视讯 WANG Y Y. Effects of soil and light on forage seed germination, seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics in an apple orchard of eastern. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2018. -
[13]
王红俊. 9种冷季型草坪草耐盐性、抗旱性及坪用性研究. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
WANG H J. Compartive evaluation of turf quality, salt tolerance and drought tolerance of 9 cultivars cool-season turf-grasses. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2014. -
[14]
池永宽, 熊康宁, 宋淑珍, 肖华, 张俞, 许留兴. 石漠化地区单播与混播牧草光合差异研究[J]. 家畜生态学报家畜生态学报, 2016, 37(2): 53-59.
CHI Y K, XIONG K N, SONG S Z, XIAO H, ZHANG Y, XU L X. Study on phyotosynthetic differences between monoculture and mixed sowing forage grass in rocky desertification area[J]. Acta Ecologiae Animalis DomasticiActa Ecologiae Animalis DomasticiBG视讯, 2016, 37(2): 53-59. -
[15]
何瑞, 苏朝棉, 赵娇娇, 畅引东. 遮阴处理对蟹爪兰和盆栽榕树生理特性的影响[J]. 山西农业科学山西农业科学, 2018, 46(11): 1811-1813. doi:
HE R, SU Z M, ZHAO J J, CHANG Y D. Effects of shading treatment on physiological characteristics of Potted banyan and Crab claw[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural SciencesJournal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(11): 1811-1813. doi: -
[16]
杨渺, 毛凯, 马金星. 遮阴生境下假俭草的形态变化与能量分配研究[J]. 中国草地中国草地, 2004, 26(2): 45-49, 63.
YANG M, MAO K, MA J X. Study of morphological change and energy distribution of Centipede grass under shade condition[J]. Grassland of ChinaGrassland of ChinaBG视讯, 2004, 26(2): 45-49, 63. -
[17]
代莉, 谢双喜. 皂荚一年生幼苗对不同光照强度的生态适应性[J]. 贵州农业科学贵州农业科学, 2004, 32(4): 14-16. doi:
DAI L, XIE S X. The ecological adaptation of 1-year Gleditsia sinensis seedling to different light intensities[J]. Guizhou Agricultural SciencesGuizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 32(4): 14-16. doi: -
[18]
陆燕元, 马焕成, 李昊民, 邓西平. 土壤干旱对转基因甘薯光合曲线的响应[J]. 生态学报生态学报, 2015, 35(7): 2155-2160.
LU Y Y, MA H C, LI H M, DENG X P. Light response characteristics of photosynthetic of transgenic sweet potato under drought stress[J]. Acta Ecologica SinicaActa Ecologica SinicaBG视讯, 2015, 35(7): 2155-2160. -
[19]
李佳, 刘济明, 文爱华, 邓明明, 熊雪, 柳嘉佳. 米槁幼苗光合作用及光响应曲线模拟对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 1-9. doi:
LI J, LIU J M, WEN A H, DENG M M, XIONG X, LIU J J. Simulated photosynthetic responses of Cinnamomum migao during drought stress evaluated using light-response models[J]. Acta Ecologica SinicaActa Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 1-9. doi: -
[20]
杨丽娟, 盛坤, 李晓航, 王映红. 灌水对不同小麦品种叶绿素含量及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技现代农业科技, 2018, (21): 36-39. doi:
YANG L J, SHENG K, LI X H, WANG Y H. Effects of irrigation on chlorophyll content and yield of different wheat varieties[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and TechnologyModern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, (21): 36-39. doi: -
[21]
马彩娟, 何冰, 孙计平, 李雪君, 符新妍, 吴彦辉. 烤烟类胡萝卜素降解产物的配合力分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报河南农业大学学报, 2017, 51(4): 465-470.
MA C J, HE B, SUN J P, LI X J, FU X Y, WU Y H. Analysis on combining ability of the degradation products of carotenoids in flue cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural UniversityJournal of Henan Agricultural University, 2017, 51(4): 465-470. -
[22]
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[J]. 北京: 高等教育出版社北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000, (): 134-137.
LI H S. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiment[J]. Beijing: Higher Education PressBeijing: Higher Education Press, 2000, (): 134-137. -
[23]
公绪云, 饶兴权, 周丽霞, 王晓玲, 朱小林, 蔡锡安. 尾叶桉林下5种植物的耐阴性、生物量及其个体消长[J]. 生态学报生态学报, 2018, 38(3): 1124-1133.
GONG X Y, RAO X Q, ZHOU L X, WANG X L, ZHU X L, CAI X A. Dynamics of shade tolerance biomass and individual growth of five understory plant species in Eucalyptus urophylla plantations[J]. Acta Ecologica SinicaActa Ecologica SinicaBG视讯, 2018, 38(3): 1124-1133. -
[24]
曹良军, 刘宝臣, 唐伟斌, 申焕焕. 遮阴对麦冬叶面积和叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 中国园艺文摘中国园艺文摘, 2011, 27(7): 1-3. doi:
CAO L J, LIU B C, TANG W B, SHEN H H. Effect of shading on leaf area and chlorophyll contents of Ophiopogonis japonicus[J]. Chinese Horticulture AbstractsChinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2011, 27(7): 1-3. doi: -
[25]
周兴元, 曹福亮, 陈志明, 刘国华. 遮荫对几种暖地型草坪草成坪速度及其景观效果的影响[J]. 草原与草坪草原与草坪, 2003, (2): 26-29. doi:
ZHOU X Y, CAO F L, CHEN Z M, LIU G H. Effect of shading on warm-season turf establishment[J]. Grassland and TurfGrassland and Turf, 2003, (2): 26-29. doi: -
[26]
孙小玲, 许岳飞, 马鲁沂, 周禾. 植株叶片的光合色素构成对遮阴的响应[J]. 植物生态学报植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 989-999. doi:
SUN X L, XU Y F, MA L Y, ZHOU H. A review of acclimation of photosynthetic pigment composition in plant leaves to shade environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant EcologyChinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(8): 989-999. doi: -
[27]
周红, 李建龙, 黄武强, 江宏娟, 王艳, 姜涛. 不同遮阴条件下几种草坪草的耐阴性及观赏品质比较[J]. 草原与草坪草原与草坪, 2010, 30(6): 19-25. doi:
ZHOU H, LI J L, HUANG W Q, JIANG H J, WANG Y, JIANG T. Comparisons on shade-tolerance and ornamental quality of several turfgrasses under different shading conditions[J]. Grassland and TurfGrassland and Turf, 2010, 30(6): 19-25. doi: -
[28]
孙小玲, 孙玉胜, 许岳飞, 周禾. 不同草坪草体内类胡萝卜素含量的比较[J]. 草地学报草地学报, 2009, 17(4): 428-434. doi:
SUN X L, SUN Y S, XU Y F, ZHOU H. Comparison of carotenoids content in different turfgrass species[J]. Acta Agrestia SinicaActa Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(4): 428-434. doi: -
[29]
钟楚, 朱勇. 烟草气孔导度对光强的响应[J]. 中国生态农业学报中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(8): 966-972.
ZHONG C, ZHU Y. Response of stomatal conductance to light in tobacco plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-AgricultureChinese Journal of Eco-AgricultureBG视讯, 2013, 21(8): 966-972. -
[30]
孙建明. 高羊茅不同基因型抗旱性评价及其生理调节机理研究. 上海: 上海交通大学博士学位论文, 2013.
BG视讯 SUN J M. Evaluation of drought resistance and physiological regulation mechanism of tall fescue genotypes. PhD Thesis. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013. -
[31]
张学权, 胡庭兴, 张健. 不同遮荫度对三种牧草净光合速率和生物量影响的比较分析[J]. 四川林业科技四川林业科技, 2006, 27(3): 24-27. doi:
ZHANG X Q, HU J X, ZHANG J. Comparative analysis of the net photosynthetic rate and the biomass among three forage grasses under different tree-grass shading degrees[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and TechnologyJournal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 27(3): 24-27. doi: -
[32]
王娟, 林磊, 向杨, 王俊, 郑军, 李伟, 胡庭兴. 不同遮阴度对几种牧草生长的影响[J]. 四川林业科技四川林业科技, 2006, 27(2): 72-76. doi:
WANG J, LIN L, XIANG Y, WANG J, ZHENG J, LI W, HU T X. Effects of shading treatment on the growth of several herbage species[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and TechnologyJournal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 27(2): 72-76. doi: -
[33]
刘建新, 王金成, 王瑞娟, 贾海燕. 外源一氧化氮对渗透胁迫下黑麦草幼苗光合和生物发光特性的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 210-216. doi:
LIU J X, WANG J C, WANG R J, JIA H Y. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on photosynthetic and bioluminescent characteristics in ryegrass seedling under osmotic stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 210-216. doi: -
[34]
韦兰英, 莫凌, 袁维圆, 曾丹娟, 焦继飞, 尤业明. 不同遮阴强度对猕猴桃" 桂海4号”光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 广西科学广西科学, 2009, 16(3): 326-330. doi:
WEI L Y, MO L, YUAN W Y, ZENG D J, JIAO J F, YOU Y M. Responses of photosynthetic characterization of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis planch cv. Guihaia 4) submitted to shading[J]. Guangxi SciencesGuangxi Sciences, 2009, 16(3): 326-330. doi: -
[35]
严海燕, 董然, 金光勋, 马家艳. 遮阴对富贵草光合特性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(5): 47-50, 60. doi:
YAN H Y, DONG R, JIN G X, MA J Y. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics of Pachysandra terminalis[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry UniversityJournal of Northeast Forestry University, 2013, 41(5): 47-50, 60. doi: -
[36]
赵雅洁. 喀斯特土壤厚度和水分减少对混种后两种不同根系类型草本生长生理和竞争的影响. 重庆: 西南大学硕士学位论文, 2018.
ZHAO Y J. Effect of decline in soil depth and water resource on the growth, physiology and competition of two grasses with different root types under mixed plantation in karst region. Master Thesis. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2018. -
[37]
高传友. 广西地区15种典型园林观赏植物的耐阴性及光合特性[J]. 江苏农业科学江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(4): 209-214.
GAO C Y. Tolerance of shade and photosynthetic characteristics of 15 typical garden ornamental plants in Guangxi[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural ScienceJiangsu Agricultural Science, 2016, 44(4): 209-214.
-
[1]
-
BG视讯
图 1 BG视讯 不同遮阴梯度下高羊茅叶绿素含量
Figure 1. Chlorophyll content of Festuca arundinacea under different shading conditions
图 2 不同遮阴梯度下多年生黑麦草叶绿素含量
Figure 2. Chlorophyll content of Lolium perenne under different shading conditions
图 3 不同遮阴梯度下高羊茅气孔导度对不同光强的响应
Figure 3. Response of the stomatal conductance of Festuca arundinacea to different light intensity under different shading conditions
图 4 不同遮阴梯度下多年生黑麦草气孔导度对不同光强的响应
Figure 4. Response of the stomatal conductance of Lolium perenne to different light intensity under different shading conditions
图 5 BG视讯 不同遮阴梯度下高羊茅净光合速率对不同光强的响应
Figure 5. Response of the net photosynthetic rate of Festuca arundinaceaBG视讯 to different light intensities under different shading conditions
图 6 BG视讯 不同遮阴梯度下多年生黑麦草净光合速率对不同光强的响应
Figure 6. Response of the net photosynthetic rate of Lolium perenneBG视讯 to different light intensities under different shading conditions
表 1 遮阴梯度
Table 1. Shade intensity
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 光响应参数
Table 2. Optical response parameters
植物种 Plant species 处理 Treatment 最大光合速率
Maximum assimilation rate/
[μmol·(m2·s)–1]光补偿点
Light compensation point/
[μmol·(m2·s)–1]光饱和点
Light saturation point/
[μmol·(m2·s)–1]高羊茅
Festuca arundinacea对照 Control 10.30 ± 0.82a 27.73 ± 0.57a 234.04 ± 0.68a 50%遮阴 Shade 50% 7.91 ± 0.43ab 20.19 ± 0.35b 85.42 ± 0.53b 70%遮阴 Shade 70% 5.58 ± 0.43b 17.14 ± 0.36b 90.86 ± 0.49b 多年生黑麦草
Lolium perenne对照 Control 4.67 ± 0.43b 23.71 ± 0.52b 119.37 ± 0.34c 50%遮阴 Shade 50% 4.99 ± 0.25b 38.22 ± 0.64a 208.49 ± 0.58a 70%遮阴 Shade 70% 8.22 ± 0.39a 39.17 ± 0.66a 187.32 ± 0.60b 同列不同小写字母表示同种不同处理间差异显著 (P < 0.05)。
Different lowercase letters within the same colunm indicate significant difference between different treatments in the same species at the 0.05 level.下载: 导出CSV
-